Hirst Applegate successfully defended a child and adolescent psychiatrist in a medical malpractice case. Following a seven-day jury trial in northern Wyoming, the jury returned a verdict in favor of both the psychiatrist and the acute mental health facility, represented by different counsel, where the care was provided.
The Plaintiff brought medical malpractice claims against both the psychiatrist and the facility, asking the jury for $1.95 million in damages. The Plaintiff claimed inadequate observation orders and patient monitoring led to a patient-on-patient sexual assault. The case centered on the complexities of care within an acute mental health setting and with sensitive topics including sexual assault and suicidal ideation. Hirst Applegate’s defense focused on the facts of the case, the documentation, and the standard of care provided by the psychiatrist.
After nearly seven hours of deliberations, the jury found that both the facility and the psychiatrist were not liable. This verdict underscores the firm’s commitment to defending medical professionals and mental health providers.